Compare AWS Cloudfront vs. CDN.NET

Content delivery network delivers the content to users and webpages with the help of distributed servers. It is the best method to communicate with other users, share content and engage. However, over the past few years, the field of CDN has seen some major advancements.

What is CDN.net?

CDN.net was founded in 2012 and has been called the “Uber of CDNS.” Headquartered in London, UK, CDN.net is built on the federated CDN platform of OnApp.

Depending upon the region of the users, CDN.net offers a mere sub-50ms latency. This is exceptional when compared to the other CDN providers. The users can control their active PoPs and are billed only for active and in-use Pops. The top clients for CDN.net include WizqDurrell and Kaaloga.

What is Amazon CloudFront?

Amazon has also stepped up its game and created CloudFront to deliver content. It can be used as a stand-alone application, or in combination with other Amazon web products. It can easily be combined with Amazon Web Services (AWS) or Amazon S3 to utilize the maximum potential of Amazon services.

The top clients for Amazon CloudFront are NHL and Nasty Gal. The pricing plans are more complex than the other CDN providers.

What Are the Features Offered?

Let’s compare these and find out the best platform for instant and best content delivery service.

  • Points of Presence: CDN.net offers 179 PoPs, whereas Amazon CloudFront offers only 41 PoPs. CDN.net wins in this category by offering more locations for content delivery to the users. Its quick, fast and can relay the data efficiently.
  • Purging Capabilities: Some CDNs offer quick and instant purging, while other may take up to an hour or more. CDN.net offers “Purge All” functionality to the users. Additionally, the instant purge feature takes less up to 30 seconds for purging.
  • Real-time Support: CDN.net offer real-time statistics for the users, but CloudFront doesn’t. The stats help the users determine the quality of their content distribution and allow them to manage their content in an efficient manner.
  • Quick and Online Signup: All the major CDN service providers offer online signup nowadays. CloudFront and CDN.net offer quick set up and sign up options.
  • SSL Certificates: While both services offer shared SSL certificates for protection and security, CloudFront also provide custom SSL certificates for free. CDN.net will charge for custom SSL certificates, and this is the reason it lacks behind in this category.CDN.net offer full support for Shared SSL, Custom SSL and Wildcard SSL Certificates.
  • Multiple CDNs and CDN Balancing: None of the services offer support or integration for multiple CDNs. Furthermore, they also lack in the CDN balancing category. Many of the recent CDN services offer integration with multiple CDNs and CDN balancing tech for an optimal usability. However, CDN.net offers modern CDN balancing techniques to the users. This makes CDN.net fully customizable and more efficient than other CDNs.
  • Human Support: One of the most important features of any CDN service is the quick and helpful support services provided by the organization. CDN.net offers free email support from 8 AM to 8 PM. If you want 24⁄7 support, you will have to pay for that. In case of CloudFront, you can find support on community forum for free. You will have to pay extra for phone and email support.
  • Third-party Integration: Almost all the major services offer stand-alone APIs nowadays. CloudFront offer exclusive API support for Purge, Statistics and Configuration Management. Users can easily link these up in their code, and view run-time stats. However, CDN.net hasn’t offered any support so far.
  • RMTP Streaming and Video On Demand: CDN.net offers RMTP streaming functionality for the modern devices. RMTP and HLS streaming is on top of the market right now, and this feature puts it on top of the CDN providers. CDN.net also fully supports video-on-demand feature.
  • Origin Push, Origin Pull and Origin Shield: We have all debated the perks and the cons of Push and Pull CDNs from time to time. Push requires more effort on the user’s end, as the user has to create links to the file before sending them to the server. Pull CDN, however, is easier to manage. With Pull CDN, the content is fetched from the nearest edge server. All the content is cached in one place, and the CDN does all the work. CDN.net offers both the functionalities. However, additional costs are charged for Push feature. CDN.net also offers full support for Origin Shield.
  • Other Bells and Whistles: Both the service providers offer anti-DDos, DNS resolution and WAF options for the users. This increases the security of the platforms and allows them to communicate effectively without facing any hindrances on run-time. Control panel is also offer in both the services. This makes it easier to configure, manage and run the CDNs. CDN.net also offers Gzip compression, HTTP2 Protocol, SPDY Protocol and access to Raw logs.

What Are the Pricing Packages?

In terms of pricing, both the services strive to offer reasonable yet competitive packages for the users. Here is the overview of the pricing system for the services.

Price Comparison: AWS Cloudfront vs CDN.net

What Do We Have to Say?

CDN.net and Amazon CloudFront go toe-to-toe in terms of Content delivery, pricing and features offered. However, if we had to pick a winner, it would be CDN.net. It offers a higher level of support due to its years in the industry.

Furthermore, it is highly customizable, user-friendly and quite intuitive for beginners. CloudFront is relatively younger and has a lot to conquer before moving up in the world of CDNs.

If you want a CDN which can easily be integrated with your existing systems, then CDN.net should be your answer. It offers exclusive APIs for support. Moreover, if you want a CDN which triumphs in overall reputation, speed, efficiency, and optimization, then CDN.net is the perfect solution to all your requirements.

No comments

Be the first to post a comment.

Post a comment